Editorial Research & Draft
Move a relevant story from discovery through research, drafting, fact review, and an editor-ready package.
The operating contract.
What goes in, what comes out, where a person stays in control, and what can be trusted today.
What the system needs
- Approved feeds and topic boundaries
- Existing article library
- Editorial quality and freshness rules
What the system returns
- Ranked story leads
- Research dossiers and content briefs
- Draft articles with quality reports
- Publish-ready files after review
Current working boundary
- Documented implementation evidence covers feed intake, investigation, freshness filtering, and brief creation
- Draft, humanizing, fact-review, and quality modules are connected in one pipeline contract
- Dry-run and reviewed file-publication paths are separated
Where judgment stays
An editor approves the thesis, source set, material claims, final copy, and publishing decision.
One outcome, four controlled stages.
Each stage has a bounded job and a visible handoff. The next step never has to invent the context the previous step already learned.
- 01
Scout
Find timely leads inside approved sources and topic boundaries.
- 02
Investigate
Build a source set, check freshness, and reject weak or stale premises.
- 03
Draft
Create a structured article and refine it for clarity and natural voice.
- 04
Review
Check facts and quality, then hold publication for an editor.
Why this status is honest.
Documented implementation evidence covers discovery, investigation, brief creation, drafting, fact review, quality scoring, and separated dry-run or reviewed file-publication paths. It does not establish production operation on its own.
Use now means a public path exists. Internal proof means supervised working evidence exists. Blueprint means the operating contract is designed but the full system is not proven.