Release Readiness Review
Check a public product surface for brand drift, search gaps, weak conversion paths, and release blockers before it ships.
The operating contract.
What goes in, what comes out, where a person stays in control, and what can be trusted today.
What the system needs
- A route and its source files
- Visible page text when a runtime is available
- Brand, search, answer, and conversion rules
What the system returns
- Per-page quality scores
- Prioritized findings with exact repairs
- Machine-readable and review-ready reports
- A final release decision for the owner
Current working boundary
- Reusable checks exist for brand consistency and conversion paths
- The reporting layer groups findings by severity and page
- Source-only review and live-page evidence are kept distinct
Where judgment stays
A responsible owner validates every blocker and makes the final release decision. A score cannot approve a product by itself.
One outcome, four controlled stages.
Each stage has a bounded job and a visible handoff. The next step never has to invent the context the previous step already learned.
- 01
Collect
Resolve the intended route, source, runtime, and policy before scoring.
- 02
Inspect
Run deterministic and judgment-based checks against the available evidence.
- 03
Prioritize
Group the exact findings by severity, user impact, and required repair.
- 04
Decide
Give a responsible owner the evidence needed to release or hold.
Why this status is honest.
The repository contains modular site-quality checks and report generation for brand, search, answer, copy, and conversion review. A universal production gate is not yet proven.
Use now means a public path exists. Internal proof means supervised working evidence exists. Blueprint means the operating contract is designed but the full system is not proven.